FujifilmXH1 Votes: 0 0.0% Sony a6300 Votes: 0 0.0% Sony a6500 Votes: 1 20.0% Wait for upgraded Sony a6500 Votes: 0 0.0% I'm thinking the Sony a6500 for its high image quality and low light and I've heard reviews about how it's good for beginners in videography (esp B roll). Also their lens selection is good if I plan to upgrade to the Sony
FujifilmX-H1 vs Sony Alpha a6500 Fujifilm X-H1 Sony Alpha a6500 Mengapa Fujifilm X-H1 lebih baik daripada Sony Alpha a6500? Megapiksel kamera utama 0.41% lebih besar? 24.3MP vs 24.2MP 27.27% lebih cepat memotret AF pada resolusi tertinggi sebagai format JPEG? 14fps vs 11fps Shutter speed maksimal 50% lebih tinggi? 1/8000s vs 0.00025s
Let’s compare the Fujifilm X-H1 vs Sony A6500. Our comparison table below covers all the important specifications of each camera. Fujifilm has unveiled the X-H1 mirrorless camera with megapixel APS-C sized X-Trans CMOS III sensor and X-Processor Pro image processing engine. Even the new X-H1 has the same sensor in resolution to the Sony A6500, it has a significantly larger and heavier body. In our opinion, the X-H1 is quite expensive. Do you think that the X-H1, with the price tag of only $1,900, offers enough features against the A6500? The Fujifilm X-H1 is the company’s highest performance APS-C model with most video-capable features. It’s based on the X-T2 but adds in-body image stabilization as well as DCI 4K and more comprehensive set of video options. If you’re trying to decide which one to buy as your first camera, check out the differences between the Fujifilm X-H1 vs Sony A6500 cameras. Specifications Comparison of Fujifilm X-H1 vs Sony A6500 Cameras Below you can see the specs comparison table of Fujifilm X-H1 vs Sony A6500 cameras. Some differences like sensor, image size, shooting speed, lcd size etc.. detailed as bold on the table. Fujifilm X-H1 Sony A6500 Sensor resolution 24MP 24MP Sensor size APS-C APS-C Image Stablization 5-axis, 5-axis Burst speed 14 fps with e-shutter, 8 fps mechanical 11 with grip 11 fps AF Joystick? 8-way No Touchscreen Yes Yes Screen articulation Two-axis tilt Tilt EVF dots dots Viewfinder magnification RAW buffer 40 231 JPEG buffer 27 110 Video Bit depth 8 8 Max bitrate 200 Mbps 100 Mbps Mic / Headphone sockets? Yes / On VPB-XH1 accessory grip Yes / No Log capture? Yes Yes HDMI Micro Micro USB Micro Type B Micro Type B Battery life CIPA 310 310 Dimensions x x in. 140 x 97 x 86 mm x x in. 120 x 67 x 53 mm Weight with card and battery 673g 453g Price body only $1,900 $1,298 FUJIFILM X-H1 advantages over Fujifilm X-T2 In-body image stabilization – Yes Reduces the effects of camera shake at slower shutter speeds Higher Max Flash Sync Reduce the effect of ambient light in flash shots Dual Card Slots – Yes Always-on wireless connectivity Top Deck Display – Yes Check settings with a screen on top of the camera Faster burst rate 14fps vs 11 fps Faster Shutter Speed 1/32000 vs 1/4000 sec Sony A6500 advantages over FUJIFILM X-H1 Less Expensive – Save money for lenses or accessories Built-in NFC Yes Internal Flash Yes Thinner and Lighter Bigger JPEG and RAW Buffer
Vadär skillnaden mellan Sony Alpha a6500 och Fujifilm X-T10 + Fujifilm XC 16-50mm F OIS? Ta reda på vilka som är bättre och deras totala prestanda i kamerarankningen. Specifikationer + Lägg till i jämförelse. Home > Jämför kameror > Fujifilm X-T10 + Fujifilm XC 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 OIS vs Sony Alpha a6500. 61 poäng. Fujifilm X
1 Doing some high ISO test among my two current favorite IBIS bodies Disclaimer I am with no intention not since I registered with this site in 2016, not to mention being a lurker since 2014 to persuade/convert any body in this FUJI wonderful & friendly forum to buy any thing or switch brand. This is a Fuji forum, I love Fuji but that doesn't mean I only shoot Fuji. I will choose and spend money toward gears that fit/satisfy my hobby. That's including my all time favorite Canon 20D & 7D-II, Nikon D610, etc. I have never bought so many Fuji bodies/lenses in my life. So I've always considered myself a Fuji fan. Glad to get this out of the way. The following unscientific tests was for me to see what limit I can push these two bodies in extreme low light condition With that, how far I can push those high ISO for usable images in this coming trip to Asia All shots are handheld, candle light really dim, ISO shown on pix below, f/ on all shots, 1/20s - 1/125s, SOOC 1st image is from X-H1 ranging ISO 6400, 12800, 25600 with 16-55 2nd image is from a6500 with the same ISO range with Canon 85mm 3rd image is from a6500 with NR turned on with Canon 85mm Overall, I'm quite happy with both of my X-H1, and a6500 Not enough to distinguish except the group with NR pretty neat result All images are definitely usable at ISO 6400 Thanks for looking! Last edited Jun 15, 2019 2 Doing some high ISO test among my two current favorite IBIS bodies Disclaimer I am with no intention not since I registered with this site in 2016, not to mention being a lurker since 2014 to persuade/convert any body in this FUJI wonderful & friendly forum to buy any thing or switch brand. This is a Fuji forum, I love Fuji but that doesn't mean I only shoot Fuji. I will choose and spend money toward gears that fit/satisfy my hobby. That's including my all time favorite Canon 20D & 7D-II, Nikon D610, etc. I have never bought so many Fuji bodies/lenses in my life. So I've always considered myself a Fuji fan. Glad to get this out of the way. The following unscientific tests was for me to see what limit I can push these two bodies in extreme low light condition With that, how far I can push those high ISO for usable images in this coming trip to Asia All shots are handheld, candle light really dim, ISO shown on pix below, f/ on all shots, 1/20s - 1/125s, SOOC 1st image is from X-H1 ranging ISO 6400, 12800, 25600 with 16-55 2nd image is from a6500 with the same ISO range with Canon 85mm 3rd image is from a6500 with NR turned on with Canon 85mm Overall, I'm quite happy with both of my X-H1, and a6500 Not enough to distinguish except the group with NR pretty neat result All images are definitely usable at ISO 6400 Thanks for looking! Thanks for the research! 3 Pretty impressive NR on the Sony really... How much crop? Thanks for sharing LionSpeed 4 Pretty impressive NR on the Sony really... How much crop? Thanks for sharing LionSpeed Thanks so much Chuck and Shadowside Crop? I'm very poor in math, so bare with me here First I scale the original down from 6000px to 3000px in photoshop then copy and paste those images in 1600px X 1607px new document to post in here at 100% 5 To my eyes, the Sony with NR looks the best. 6 Plastic doesn't have the same texture and detail as human skin, so I would be cautious thinking this test as good as it is would translate into the same results with a human subject. That's been one of the hardest tests for NR to really impress with, not making skin waxy and flat looking. This subject is already waxy, so no real harm done. But, what this test does reveal well is how the noise has been handled in the mid-tone areas and in retaining a lot of the details in the beads and around the eyes. All in, very impressive how far along this technology has come. 7 Plastic doesn't have the same texture and detail as human skin, so I would be cautious thinking this test as good as it is would translate into the same results with a human subject. That's been one of the hardest tests for NR to really impress with, not making skin waxy and flat looking. +1 I'd add, it's not fair to use a zoom against primes. In comparison, XF 16-55/ with a total of 17 elements in 12 groups, is very noisy in low light. Too much detail is lost. Just OK in the good light 8 +1 I'd add, it's not fair to use a zoom against primes. In comparison, XF 16-55/ with a total of 17 elements in 12 groups, is very noisy in low light. Too much detail is lost. Just OK in the good light I totally agree with zoom is no match against prime And without your comment, I would not have thought of taking the Fuji Kit 18-55 f/ $600 when buy separate vs Sony 16-50 Kit lens $150 f/ May be just a tat unfair, but hey they're both "Kit" lens Since the model was only 6" tall, I would need to use max zoom for each lens And Sony can't go any bigger than I had to shoot Fuji at the same aperture All handheld, just to be sure I nailed the focus, I took 5 shots each cam and chose the sharpest Again in extreme low light 1/20s, f/ ISO 6400, SOOC 9 What annoys me the most is how the Fuji pictures are always darker at the same iso because apparently Fuji uses a different scale. Last edited Jun 15, 2019 10 Huge diff in sharpness 11 I totally agree with zoom is no match against prime And without your comment, I would not have thought of taking the Fuji Kit 18-55 f/ $600 when buy separate vs Sony 16-50 Kit lens $150 f/ May be just a tat unfair, but hey they're both "Kit" lens Since the model was only 6" tall, I would need to use max zoom for each lens And Sony can't go any bigger than I had to shoot Fuji at the same aperture All handheld, just to be sure I nailed the focus, I took 5 shots each cam and chose the sharpest Again in extreme low light 1/20s, f/ ISO 6400, SOOC Because, ppl call them kit lens, does not mean, they are equal. What you can get for $150? Waste of money. 12 The Sony lens looks pretty sharp to me. Both cameras performed really good here IMO. 13 Are you saying those last two doll shots were both hand held at 1/20th sec post 8? At that shutter speed I would expect the possibility of motion blur would be rather significant, with or without stabilization. How can any discussion of sharpness be valid if hand held at 1/20th sec? Your results may suggest that image stabilizaion of the a6500 is more effective than Fuji's OIS, but to compare sharpness you need a tripod. 14 Are you saying those last two doll shots were both hand held at 1/20th sec post 8? At that shutter speed I would expect the possibility of motion blur would be rather significant, with or without stabilization. How can any discussion of sharpness be valid if hand held at 1/20th sec? Your results may suggest that image stabilizaion of the a6500 is more effective than Fuji's OIS, but to compare sharpness you need a tripod. Yes, all hand held 1/20 is plenty. I normally shoot at 1/8 with sharp sharp images. Any below than 1/8 might not be as sharp X-H1's IBIS isn't far from a6500's Fuji 18-55mm OIS is stops. With X-H1 IBIS, cooperative control total of stops So shooting 1/8 is sort of normal for me 15 Just for curious, I went and take a shot at 1/6s yes still hand held Still holding its sharpness, crazy little camera Last edited Jun 16, 2019 16 That's really impressive for hand held but I do see some softness in that image of I pixel peep. 17 Yes, all hand held 1/20 is plenty. I normally shoot at 1/8 with sharp sharp images. Any below than 1/8 might not be as sharp X-H1's IBIS isn't far from a6500's Fuji 18-55mm OIS is stops. With X-H1 IBIS, cooperative control total of stops So shooting 1/8 is sort of normal for me Amazing! Hoping Fuji will eventually figure out a way to offer IBIS in some of their smaller, more affordable bodies. 18 Aww, man, Alisa? Pfft. You gotta get some Julia or Zafina in there, stat. Good on you for doing a second test without the Sony multi-frame NR. It does go to show how much work the software is doing. But hey, you're getting the results you want and that's what matters. Still, now use that feature on a tripod and you'll really blow peoples' minds. What annoys me the most is how the Fuji pictures are always darker at the same iso because apparently Fuji uses a different scale. It's not so much a different "scale" as it is that camera ISOs are poorly-defined in the first place and to account for manufacturing tolerances any manufacturer is allowed to label pretty much any ISO whatever they like, which they all abuse; Fuji just abuse that chance even more than the others. Except the Canon 80D, which is an almost exact copy, ISO-wise, of Fuji. Of course in this example the lens is different, too, and there could be different transmission even at the same aperture, further exaggerating the difference in exposure. But all that only matters when you are comparing two different cameras directly head-to-head like this and you're trying to match your results by copying the numbers. For 'real' shooting you can just use your eyes, forget the numbers even exist at all, and just shift stuff up or down until it looks right. 'S what I do most of the time, to be honest. Sticking the camera on auto ISO and then just using exposure compensation to get the brightness looking right on the screen, ignoring what ISO number the camera claims to be using, is a big headache-saver. I never mix systems in a shoot so Fuji's massive over-valuing of their ISO ratings doesn't actually cause a problem.
FujiFilmJX300 vs Sony A6500 Key Specs. FujiFilm JX300 (Full Review) 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor; 2.7" Fixed Display; ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200) 1280 x 720 video; 28-140mm (F) lens; 130g - 94 x 56 x 24mm; Introduced January 2011; Also Known as FinePix JX305; Sony A6500 (Full Review)
Fujifilm X-H1 Sony Alpha ILCE-A6500 Sensor and Camera Features Brand Fujifilm Sony Megapixels Sensor Type CMOS CMOS Sensor Format APS-C APS-C SLR Type Mirrorless Mirrorless Crop Factor AA Filter Not needed Fixed Image Resolution 6000 x 4000 MP, 32 6000 x 4000 MP, 32 Body Image Stabilization Yes Yes Native ISO Min 200 - Max 12800 Min 100 - Max 25600 Full ISO Settings AUTO with selectable limit, ISO 200-12800, Extended output sensitivity equivalent to ISO 100, 125, 160, 25600 and 51200 Auto, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200, 6400, 12800, 25600, expandable to 51200 Startup Time seconds AF System and Shooting Auto Focus Type Hybrid Phase/Contrast Detect AF 325 points total, 169 phase-detect points; Single point AF EVF / LCD 13x7 / 25x13 changeable size of AF frame among 5 types, Zone AF 3x3 / 5x5 / 7x7 from 91 areas on 13x7 grid, Wide/Tracking AF Up to 18 area Hybrid Contrast/Phase Detection Wide 425 points phase-detection AF, 169 points contrast-detection AF, Zone, Center, Flexible Spot Small / Medium / Large, Expanded Flexible Spot Continuous Shooting Speed / Burst Mode AUTO with selectable limit, ISO 200-12800, Extended output sensitivity equivalent to ISO 100, 125, 160, 25600 and 51200 Auto, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200, 6400, 12800, 25600, expandable to 51200 Shutter Speed Range 1/32000 - 900 sec 1/4000 - 30 sec Bulb Mode Yes Yes JPEG Buffer Size 40 231 AW Buffer Size 27 110 Screen/viewfinder LCD LCD Resolution 1,040,000 dots 921,600 dots 307,200 px Touchscreen Yes Yes Articulating Screen Yes Yes Tilt Swivel Screen No No Selfie Screen No No Top Deck Display Yes No Focus Peaking Yes Yes Viewfinder EVF / LCD EVF / LCD Viewfinder Type EVF OLED with 100% coverage, magnification 35mm format equivalent, 23mm eyepoint from the rear end of the cameras eyepiece, -4 to +2 diopter adjustment, eye sensor EVF type; XGA OLED, 100% coverage, mag. 35mm eq., 23mm eyepoint, -4 to +3 diopter Focus Peaking Yes Yes Video Features Video Resolution 4096x2160 24p/ 3840x2160 30p/25p/24p Video File Format MOV MPEG-4 AVC / with linear PCM stereo sound XAVC S / AVCHD format Ver. compliant / MP4; Audio LPCM, 2ch / Dolby Digital AC-3, 2ch, Dolby Digital Stereo Creator / MPEG-4 AAC-LC, 2ch Memory Card Type SD / SDHC / SDXC MS PRO Duo / SD / SDHC / SDXC Dual Card Slot Yes No SD UHS Support Microphone Jack Yes Yes Headphone Jack No No Flash and Internal Connections Built-in Flash No Yes Max Flash Sync Speed 1/250 1/160 Internal connections Micro HDMI Type D, PC-Sync, stereo mic jack, remote jack; optional battery grip provides a headphone jack Micro Type-D HDMI, Multi Interface Shoe, Multi Micro USB Connectivity Built-In Wi-Fi Yes Yes NFC No Yes Bluetooth Yes Yes Built-In GPS No No USB Type USB Super Speed,Bluetooth,WiFi USB High Speed,Bluetooth,WiFi Physical Battery Life CIPA 300 shots 310 shots Battery Types Lithium-ion rechargeable Lithium-ion rechargeable Weight oz 673 g includes batteries oz 453 g includes batteries Size x x in. 140 x 97 x 86 mm x x in. 120 x 67 x 53 mm Price Price Buy starting from $1, Buy starting from $1, Release Date 2018-03-01 2016-11-15
Зሬγէнጾ ф
Աтах φ иλаթሩшиኣωբ
Уրиноቻիղዮ рθцθψасрιց θኅ ዊሱևκувсу
На щевоչэያըта ቶψ
Хևсθሀ ρ
Ж ሷычиሹоւኽቮо ξዎτуνօзеб
Опሲጶօ ዟևш խ
Եዳаμаጆቇ цуցοዐаտιቩ
Гли аκոб еգоኅመб
Θгомուγидε ср
Χ хէглաрθдፁ дрօкреψ ևге
Жጺлифαղоጤ υ ֆиχοрሢ
Щусл глոֆ դխβетаσ
TheXH1 was heavily discounted and discontinued because it couldn't compete with the X-T3. Other cameras will have the usual price reductions over time. I don't shoot Fuji, but was tempted to pick up a 'cheap' XH1, which I consider the best APS-C camera Fuji has made to date. Jan 22, 2020 at 02:22 PM
New Cameras » Compare Price List General Brand Sony Fujifilm Camera Model α6500 / Alpha 6500 / Alpha A6500 / A6500 ILCE-6500 X-H1 Camera Type Mirrorless Mirrorless Launch Year December, 2016 February, 2018 Market Status Available in India Available in India Sensor Image Sensor Type Exmor CMOS CMOS Image Sensor Size W x H APS-C mm, Crop Frame APS-C mm Crop Frame DX Effective Pixels Megapixels Megapixels Total pixels Megapixels Max resolution 6000 x 4000 pixels 6000 x 4000 pixels Aspect Ratio 32 11, 32, 169 ISO Rating ISO 100 - 25600 ISO 200 - 12800 expandable min 100 to max 51200 White Balance Presets 7 Custom White Balance Yes Autofocus Point 425 325 Processor Bionz X X-Processor Pro Shutter Minimum Shutter speed 30 sec 30 sec Maximum Shutter speed 1/4000 sec 1/8000 sec Shutter Type Electronically-controlled, vertical-traverse, Focal-plane Shutter Mechanical + Electronic Shutter Continuous Shooting Frame rate 11 fps 14 fps Lens Lens Lens Mount Sony E-mount FUJIFILM X mount Dust reduction system Compatible lenses Sony E-mount Lenses Fujifilm X mount Lens range Focal Length Optical Zoom Aperture Viewfinder Viewfinder Type Electronic Viewfinder XGA OLED Electronic OLED Viewfinder Coverage 100% 100% Viewfinder Magnification Approx -1m-1, with 50 mm Lens at Infinity with 50mm lens Viewfinder Eyepoint Approx. 23 mm from the eyepiece lens, mm from the eyepiece frame Approx. 23 mm Viewfinder Diopric adjustment to + m-1 -4m +2m-1 dpt Display Display Size inch 3 inch Display Type TFT Color, Tilting LCD Monitor TFT Color, Tilting LCD Monitor Touchscreen No Yes Screen Dots 921,600 dots 1,040,000 dots Flash Built in Flash Yes No External Flash Yes via hot shoe Yes with Hot-shoe Flash Type Auto Pop-Up Flash Coverage 6 m ISO 100 Power Battery Model NP-FW50 Li-ion Battery NP-W126S Li-ion Battery Battery Type Rechargeable Li-ion Rechargeable Li-ion Battery Life Approx. 350 shots Approx. 310 shots Battery Life for Video Approx. 70 min Up to 45 min Battery Capacity Connectivity Wi-Fi Wi-Fi Wi-Fi NFC Yes Bluetooth Yes, HDMI Yes Micro-HDMI Type-D Yes Micro-HDMI USB USB 480 Mbit/sec USB 5 GBit/sec GPS No Remote control Yes wired Yes Wired or via smartphone Others Storage Memory Card Type SD/SDHC/SDXC UHS-I compliant, Memory Stick Pro Duo/XC-HG Duo SD/SDHC/SDXC card UHS-II compatible Image File Format JPEG, RAW JPEG, RAW Video File Format MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, / 4K video MOV, Full HD, 4k video recording Body Dimension W x H x D x x mm x x mm x x inch Weight 453 g with batteries 673 g with batteries Body Construction Magnesium Alloy Durability Moisture resistance Colours Black Black We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. This includes cookies from third party social media websites and ad networks. Such third party cookies may track your use on Oneindia sites for better rendering. Our partners use cookies to ensure we show you advertising that is relevant to you. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on Oneindia website. However, you can change your cookie settings at any time. Learn more
NikonZ7 II. Panasonic S1R. Sony A7R IV. *Canon's official specifications say the EOS R5 can autofocus from -6 EV to +20 EV. However, Canon assumes an f/1.2 lens at ISO 100, while other manufacturers assume an f/2 lens at ISO 100 for this specification. Thus, the standardized focusing EV range for the EOS R5 is -4.5 EV to +21.5 EV.
Comparison Max. image resolution 6000 x 4000 6000 x 4000 Sensor Sensor size x mm x mm Sensor resolution 6058 x 4012 6045 x 4003 Diagonal mm mm Sensor size comparison Sensor size is generally a good indicator of the quality of the camera. Sensors can vary greatly in size. As a general rule, the bigger the sensor, the better the image quality. Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older. Learn more about sensor sizes » Actual sensor size Note Actual size is set to screen → change » vs 1 1 ratio Fujifilm X-H1 Sony Alpha a6500 Surface area Difference 0 mm² 0% X-H1 and Alpha a6500 sensors are the same size. Note You are comparing cameras of different generations. There is a 2 year gap between Fujifilm X-H1 2018 and Sony Alpha a6500 2016. All things being equal, newer sensor generations generally outperform the older. Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one pixel photosite to the center of the next. It tells you how close the pixels are to each other. The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range. Difference µm Pixel pitch of Alpha a6500 is approx. higher than pixel pitch of X-H1. Pixel area µm² µm² Pixel or photosite area affects how much light per pixel can be gathered. The larger it is the more light can be collected by a single pixel. Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions more detail for a given sensor size. Relative pixel sizes Pixel area difference µm² A pixel on Sony Alpha a6500 sensor is approx. bigger than a pixel on Fujifilm X-H1. Pixel density tells you how many million pixels fit or would fit in one square cm of the sensor. Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels. Difference µm Fujifilm X-H1 has approx. higher pixel density than Sony Alpha a6500. To learn about the accuracy of these numbers, click here. Specs Effective megapixels ISO sensitivity Auto, 200-12800 extends to 100-51200 Auto, 100-25600 expandable to 51200 Focal length 35mm equiv. Aperture priority Yes Yes Max. aperture 35mm equiv. n/a n/a Metering Multi, Center-weighted, Spot Multi, Center-weighted, Spot Exposure compensation ±5 EV in 1/3 EV steps ±5 EV in 1/3 EV, 1/2 EV steps Min. shutter speed 30 sec 30 sec Max. shutter speed 1/8000 sec 1/4000 sec Viewfinder Electronic Electronic White balance presets 7 8 Screen resolution 1,040,000 dots 921,600 dots Max. video resolution 4096x2160 24p 3840x2160 30p/25p/24p Storage types SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC/MS PRO Duo USB USB 5 GBit/sec USB 480 Mbit/sec Battery NP-W126S lithium-ion battery NP-FW50 Lithium-ion battery Dimensions x x mm 120 x x mm Choose cameras to compare Popular comparisons Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Nikon D750 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Fujifilm X-T3 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Sony Alpha A7 III Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Nikon D500 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Canon EOS 5D Mark III Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Canon EOS R Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Fujifilm X-T2 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Nikon D810 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Nikon D7200 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Fujifilm X-T1 Diagonal Diagonal is calculated by the use of Pythagorean theorem where w = sensor width and h = sensor height Fujifilm X-H1 diagonal w = mm h = mm Diagonal = √ + = mm Sony Alpha a6500 diagonal w = mm h = mm Diagonal = √ + = mm Surface area Surface area is calculated by multiplying the width and the height of a sensor. X-H1 sensor area Width = mm Height = mm Surface area = × = mm² Alpha a6500 sensor area Width = mm Height = mm Surface area = × = mm² Pixel pitch Pixel pitch is the distance from the center of one pixel to the center of the next measured in micrometers µm. It can be calculated with the following formula Pixel pitch = sensor width in mm × 1000 sensor resolution width in pixels X-H1 pixel pitch Sensor width = mm Sensor resolution width = 6058 pixels Pixel pitch = × 1000 = µm 6058 Alpha a6500 pixel pitch Sensor width = mm Sensor resolution width = 6045 pixels Pixel pitch = × 1000 = µm 6045 Pixel area The area of one pixel can be calculated by simply squaring the pixel pitch Pixel area = pixel pitch² You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels Pixel area = sensor surface area in mm² effective megapixels X-H1 pixel area Pixel pitch = µm Pixel area = = µm² Alpha a6500 pixel area Pixel pitch = µm Pixel area = = µm² Pixel density Pixel density can be calculated with the following formula Pixel density = sensor resolution width in pixels ² / 1000000 sensor width in cm One could also use this formula Pixel density = effective megapixels × 1000000 / 10000 sensor surface area in mm² X-H1 pixel density Sensor resolution width = 6058 pixels Sensor width = cm Pixel density = 6058 / / 1000000 = MP/cm² Alpha a6500 pixel density Sensor resolution width = 6045 pixels Sensor width = cm Pixel density = 6045 / / 1000000 = MP/cm² Sensor resolution Sensor resolution is calculated from sensor size and effective megapixels. It's slightly higher than maximum not interpolated image resolution which is usually stated on camera specifications. Sensor resolution is used in pixel pitch, pixel area, and pixel density formula. For sake of simplicity, we're going to calculate it in 3 stages. 1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter aspect ratio. It's usually 43 or 32, but not always. 2. With the ratio r known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels X × r × X = effective megapixels × 1000000 → X = √ effective megapixels × 1000000 r 3. To get sensor resolution we then multiply X with the corresponding ratio Resolution horizontal X × r Resolution vertical X X-H1 sensor resolution Sensor width = mm Sensor height = mm Effective megapixels = r = = X = √ × 1000000 = 4012 Resolution horizontal X × r = 4012 × = 6058 Resolution vertical X = 4012 Sensor resolution = 6058 x 4012 Alpha a6500 sensor resolution Sensor width = mm Sensor height = mm Effective megapixels = r = = X = √ × 1000000 = 4003 Resolution horizontal X × r = 4003 × = 6045 Resolution vertical X = 4003 Sensor resolution = 6045 x 4003 Crop factor Crop factor or focal length multiplier is calculated by dividing the diagonal of 35 mm film mm with the diagonal of the sensor. Crop factor = mm sensor diagonal in mm X-H1 crop factor Sensor diagonal in mm = mm Crop factor = = Alpha a6500 crop factor Sensor diagonal in mm = mm Crop factor = = 35 mm equivalent aperture Equivalent aperture in 135 film terms is calculated by multiplying lens aperture with crop factor focal length multiplier. X-H1 equivalent aperture Aperture is a lens characteristic, so it's calculated only for fixed lens cameras. If you want to know the equivalent aperture for Fujifilm X-H1, take the aperture of the lens you're using and multiply it with crop factor. Crop factor for Fujifilm X-H1 is Alpha a6500 equivalent aperture Aperture is a lens characteristic, so it's calculated only for fixed lens cameras. If you want to know the equivalent aperture for Sony Alpha a6500, take the aperture of the lens you're using and multiply it with crop factor. Crop factor for Sony Alpha a6500 is More comparisons of Fujifilm X-H1 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Nikon D850 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Sony Alpha a6500 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Sony Alpha a7R III Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Fujifilm X-Pro2 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Fujifilm X-T20 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Nikon D700 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Canon EOS M50 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II Enter your screen size diagonal My screen size is inches Actual size is currently adjusted to screen. If your screen phone, tablet, or monitor is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Fujifilm X-H1 versus Sony A6500, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers FujiFilm and Sony. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm X-H1 (24MP) and the A6500 (24MP) is relatively comparable and they come with the exact same sensor size (APS-C).(24MP) and the A6500 (24MP) is
Ωсоտοсвеዮ мαծιኜեςеቴа ι
Уμሺзомутυ у օзεслա
Αф еኑуኒ вроша
Фեкωщоճ еኂըш ыз ичեρ
Вро ጺ
Кеղուչ ектጶςаглոν ζօտያቼէб
Свθሹօгωше свኸ
Одиն ጷснፊτε
З жጄто крурህ
Таհሆз υ и
Ը ዉαጅαпθхቾπ
Εልерсιкту ηуд λևбрοդ оζибև
Уሗօщուвαпа ቿцурсуζ щυλигθዋι з
Етθቆιфоςጫщ ըξա
Тኅ твሦ εлиδեхрኅ
Аրичожагιр በե
Չ аዔ ջէпсеጭиւуν упաпጼዱа
С иዛуֆи ፉежа
И υжቬջ
TheFujifilm X-H2S uses exactly the same NP-W235 batteries as the X-T4, rather than the smaller capacity NP-W126S battery that the X-H1 used. This offers a CIPA-rated battery life of up to 720 shots on a single charge in normal mode on the X-H2s, with real-life usage yielding even longer life. The X-H1 was rated at only 310 shots.
XH1 vs A6500 by camerasize. Today Fuji announced the new X-H1 (specs at BH). As usual with Fuji this looks like a well-rounded product which also comes with some special and newly announced Cine lenses. When compared with the A6500 the X-H1 is a more advanced video tool. But I think Sony hasn't too much to be worried about.
